Christian Chickens Come Home to Roost

There is something awfully delicious about the news that anti gay activist Stephen Green has had his prophetic ass kicked.

I know its terribly naughty, but I just cannot help taking joy from this whole thing, of course, I feel suitably guilty for doing so, but mmmmmm it's delicious. To add insult to injury there is this marvellous YouTube video where he interprets being shit on by a seagull as a sign from God, I kid you not.

In a statement from the website of Christian Voice the interfering god botherer whines about the state of affairs that has erupted from his pitiful attempt to charge the Director General of the BBC with blasphemy.

'It should be enough for Mark Thompson and Jonathan Thoday that they got away with blasphemy, insulting God and the Lord Jesus Christ, at least in this life. For these rich, powerful men to pursue me into the bankruptcy courts over money I don't have would be vindictive.'

What an arrogant chap he is! Firstly Mr Green, Mark and Jonathan did not get away with anything, they won you ninny, yes, beat you, roundly trounced your ridiculous action and in the process gave immense joy to the likes of me who find your anti gay activities distasteful and outdated claptrap.

Secondly, whether they are rich or powerful is besides the point. You wouldn't go to a top class restaurant, gorge yourself stupid then bet your mate on a toss of a coin the price of the meal unless you had the money would you? It just goes to illustrate the righteous cause mentality that drove you to believe you could not possibly lose the case, subsequently allowing you to do just that.

Thirdly, your definition of vindictive is obviously a one sided affair considering the hate you spout about gay people and I can only hope that this has taught you a well needed lesson. Unfortunately the tenor of your statement above seems to show otherwise.

He continues:

'How are people with limited means expected to bring actions of public importance against public bodies or wealthy people? It is outrageous that a public-spirited individual should be dissuaded from upholding standards of public decency in a public body because of the fear of adverse, grotesque costs orders.'

Public, the public Mr Greene? Surely you mean the latest group of noisy ne'er-do-wells blabbering on about their particular fairy in the sky, acting as if they have a messianic remit to impose a group delusion on the rest of us.

Public, public decency Mr Greene? Surely you mean the decency of a group of bigots obsessed with where, when and up whom a man puts his willy.

Public, public spirited Mr Greene? The action was anything but, God, whoever he is, whether he is and whatever he is; does not need your help. He has survived since time immemorial in one form or another. Mean spirited is the term you need, as in "Having or characterized by a malicious or petty spirit.".

Ergo, some would say it's actually a good thing that mean spirited bigots like you should be dissuaded from taking such actions. If you were right you would have won, wouldn't you?

Maybe a bit of bankruptcy will teach you some humility and with a bit of luck force the closure of your (in my opinion) vile site.

If that should occur and you do find yourself a bit strapped for cash can I recommend a career at Heinz, something makes me think you would fit right in.